Anti-japanische Hasstiraden in China

Das Verhältnis zwischen China und Japan ist deutlich angespannt: Antijapanische Massenproteste haben nach Peking auf weitere chinesische Städte übergegriffen, nachdem die Behörden am Samstag erstmals eine ungenehmigte Großdemonstration in der Hauptstadt toleriert hatten. Am Sonntag umstellten 3000 Demonstranten das japanische Konsulat in Südchinas Provinzhauptstadt Kanton und zogen danach zu einer Supermarktkette weiter. Aus der Sonderwirtschaftzone Shenzhen meldeten japanische Journalisten der Nachrichtenagentur Jiji einen Massenauflauf von Menschen, die zum Boykott japanischer Waren aufriefen. Sie belagerten Filialen der japanischen Supermarktkette "Jusco" und warfen mehrere Scheiben ein. Neue Proteste wurden auch aus Chengdu gemeldet, wo es schon vergangene Woche zu ersten Fällen von Vandalismus gegen einen japanischen Handelskonzern kam. Zu Übergriffen auf zwei japanische Studenten, die leicht verletzt wurden, kam es in der Nacht auf Sonntag in einem Restaurant in Shanghai, berichtete das dortige japanische Konsulat. Auch in Ostchinas Provinz Shandong soll es Kundgebungen gegen Japans unbewältigte Kriegschuld und seine erneuten Großmachtansprüche gegeben haben. Die sich ausweitenden Aktionen bringen die angespannten politischen Beziehungen zwischen Peking und Tokio auf einen neuen Tiefstand. Die japanische Regierung hat Peking mit einem offiziellen Protest zum Schutz ihrer Staatsbürger und ihres Eigentums aufgefordert und Chinas Botschafter Wang Yi einbestellt. Japans Außenminister Nobutaka Machimura nannte die Übergriffe ein "ernstes Problem" und verlangte eine Entschuldigung und Entschädigung. ... Die Herausgabe neuer japanischer Schulbücher hatte die Protestwelle in China ausgelöst. Diese verharmlosen Tokios Kriegsverbrechen in den von Japans Armee im zweiten Weltkrieg überfallenen Ländern wie China und Südkorea. Patriotische Webseiten hatten daraufhin zum Protest gegen die "japanischen Teufel, die ihre Kriegschuld verleugnen" vor Pekings größtem Elektronik-Supermarkt Hailong aufgerufen.

Update: Kritisches zum Hintergrund der Ausschreitung in einem Editorial der LA Times.


At 12:53 AM, Blogger schmetterling said...

Many germans in the forum insisted that such kind of protests were for sure organized by the government, thus, whatever it is, it is bad, since the government is bad bad bad. They maybe don't know that one of the slogans of the protests is to ask Japan to do what Germany has done after the WWII. I think the Chinese would be sad to death if they know all what most of the germans really think of them and what they are doing. :))

At 11:21 AM, Blogger schmetterling said...

hallo, sk, I hope you would link this article here, by Los Angeles Times:

At 4:27 AM, Blogger matbehns said...

Hi, I can have a look at your article but you have to post the link again, since I cannot read it completely!

At 4:06 PM, Blogger schmetterling said...

Hallo,mat! thanks for your interest. Well, I would post again here the link, if it fails, maybe you can go to www.latimes.com and search for Philip J.Cunningham. MfG!

Japan's Revisionist History
by Philip J. Cunningham
http://www.latimes.com/news/prin ... e-cunningham11apr11,1,2355075.s

At 4:07 PM, Blogger schmetterling said...

Maybe the article itself:

The United States, ever quick to criticize China for human rights abuses, has of late been remarkably silent about Japan's ethical lapses, current and historical.

Japanese politicians and publishers have made a cottage industry of denying the 1937 Nanking Massacre in which the Japanese killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in the old Chinese capital. This is an offense to Chinese sensibilities comparable with Holocaust denial in Europe. In recent months, major publishers and broadcasters have been bullied to conform and self-censor in accord with the rising tide of resurgent militarism. That tacit government approval is given to such xenophobic, right-wing thinking can be seen in the latest Ministry of Education-approved school texts that erase or evade critical lessons drawn from Japan's bad behavior in its war of aggression.

In the "New History Textbook," the Nanking Massacre is dismissed as a controversial "incident." And the war of invasion is no longer termed an invasion. New textbooks drop references to "comfort women," sex slaves of mostly Chinese and Korean origin who were forced to service Japanese fighting men in the field. To borrow a phrase from the late writer Iris Chang, the abused women are being raped a second time, this time by defenders of the Japanese army who attempt to erase them from memory.

China and the U.S. were allies in World War II, each contributing in its own way to the defeat of Japanese militarism. But the Cold War saw the U.S. turn away from China and embrace Japan, with the result that China's vast suffering, estimated at 20 million dead, was never properly memorialized or recognized by its erstwhile ally. To add insult to injury, the U.S. found it expedient to work with Emperor Hirohito and other war criminals of that era in order to facilitate occupation and bolster its anti-communism crusade. Now that the Cold War is over, it is high time the U.S. lend support to China's valid historical complaints.

But Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, who has linked his political fate with the unrepentant rightists at home and President Bush's policy abroad, keeps the unholy alliance functioning, offering vocal support for U.S. aggression in Iraq while hailing Japan's fallen military heroes of a bygone era. As if to secure U.S. complacency on controversial textbook changes, U.S. actions in Iraq have been sanitized by Japanese textbook committees that, for instance, whited out "unilateral" from a recent text.

The cozy Tokyo-Washington relationship makes it difficult for the U.S. to take a judicious stand on anti-China antics such as history textbook revision. Last October, while Koizumi was lending vocal support to Bush in the presidential race and the war in Iraq, Shueisha, one of Japan's leading publishers, suspended publication of an acclaimed historical manga (comic book), "My Country is Burning," for its unflinching portrayal of the Nanking Massacre.

In Beijing last week, Japanese Ambassador Koreshige Anami defended the publishing of right-wing textbooks as a testament to Japan's "freedom of speech and publication." Why then was veteran manga artist Motomiya Hiroshi forced to retract and apologize for "My Country is Burning"? Why then did the NHK TV network, after getting a high-level warning, preemptively cut short a program on comfort women that laid blame on the emperor? If a Chinese Internet cafe gets closed down, it's front-page news. Why isn't the U.S. equally concerned about setbacks to free speech in Japan?

The U.S. should not look the other way in the face of resurgent Japanese militarism, even though a Japan freed of the constraints of its own reprehensible past behavior might serve to keep China on edge or might add muscle to the U.S. policing of the world. The ultimate consequence of whitewashing the past could be the demise of Japan's admirable Peace Constitution, allowing Japan to retool its formidable industrial base into a weapons industry threatening its neighbors and possibly triggering an unprecedented arms race and another world war.

Philip J. Cunningham, a Fulbright research fellow, has worked on feature films and documentaries in China since 1986.

copyright belong to www.latimes.com


Kommentar veröffentlichen

<< Home